Changeset - f58d197fe1b4
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-15 16:57:05
bkuhn@ebb.org
Minor wordsmithing in the freedom to share improvements.
1 file changed with 18 insertions and 18 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -265,39 +265,39 @@ share commercially.)
 
\subsection{The Freedom to Share Improvements}
 

	
 
The freedom to modify and improve is somewhat empty without the freedom to
 
share those improvements. The Free Software community is built on the
 
share those improvements.  The Software freedom community is built on the
 
pillar of altruistic sharing of improved Free Software. Inevitably, a
 
Free Software project sprouts a mailing list where improvements are shared
 
freely among members of the development community. Such noncommercial
 
sharing must be permitted for Free Software to thrive.
 
freely among members of the development community.  Such noncommercial
 
sharing is the primary reason that Free Software thrives.
 

	
 
Commercial sharing of modified Free Software is equally important.
 
For commercial support to exist in a competitive free market, all
 
developers --- from single-person contractors to large software
 
companies --- must have the freedom to market their services as
 
improvers of Free Software. All forms of such service marketing must
 
developers -- from single-person contractors to large software
 
companies -- must have the freedom to market their services as
 
improvers of Free Software.  All forms of such service marketing must
 
be equally available to all.
 

	
 
For example, selling support services for Free Software is fully
 
permitted. Companies and individuals can offer themselves as ``the place
 
to call'' when software fails or does not function properly. For such a
 
service to be meaningful, the entity offering that service must have the
 
to call'' when software fails or does not function properly.  For such a
 
service to be meaningful, the entity offering that service needs the
 
right to modify and improve the software for the customer to correct any
 
problems that are beyond mere user error.
 

	
 
Entities must also be permitted to make available modified versions of
 
Free Software. Most Free Software programs have a ``standard version''
 
that is made available from the primary developers of the software.
 
However, all who have the software have the ``freedom to fork'' --- that
 
is, make available nontrivial modified versions of the software on a
 
permanent or semi-permanent basis. Such freedom is central to vibrant
 
developer and user interaction.
 
Software freedom licenses also permit any entity to distribute modified
 
versions of Free Software.  Most Free Software programs have a ``standard
 
version'' that is made available from the primary developers of the software.
 
However, all who have the software have the ``freedom to fork'' -- that is,
 
make available nontrivial modified versions of the software on a permanent or
 
semi-permanent basis.  Such freedom is central to vibrant developer and user
 
interaction.
 

	
 
Companies and individuals have the right to make true value-added versions
 
of Free Software. They may use freedom to share improvements to
 
of Free Software.  They may use freedom to share improvements to
 
distribute distinct versions of Free Software with different functionality
 
and features. Furthermore, this freedom can be exercised to serve a
 
disenfranchised subset of the user community. If the developers of the
 
and features.  Furthermore, this freedom can be exercised to serve a
 
disenfranchised subset of the user community.  If the developers of the
 
standard version refuse to serve the needs of some of the software's
 
users, other entities have the right to create a long- or short-lived fork
 
to serve that sub-community.
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)