Changeset - f3585ce68db1
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Tony Sebro (keynote2k) - 10 years ago 2014-03-19 16:35:09
tony@sfconservancy.org
updated analysis.
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ both a ``method of operation'' (using an approach not dissimilar to the
 
First Circuit's analysis in Lotus) and a ``functional requirement for 
 
compatability'' (using Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) and
 
Sony Computer Ent. v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) as analogies),
 
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b).  
 
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b). 
 

	
 
Perhaps not surprisingly, there have been few other cases involving a highly
 
detailed software derivative work analysis. Most often, cases involve
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)