Changeset - f31235afbc80
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
enyst - 9 years ago 2014-09-19 22:09:45
engel.nyst@gmail.com
Possible fixes for incomplete or unclear phrases

Signed-off-by: enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>
1 file changed with 9 insertions and 9 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -2975,8 +2975,8 @@ family, or household use.  Distributors are only required to provide
 
Installation Information when they convey object code in a User Product.
 

	
 
In brief, the right to convey object code in a defined class of ``User
 
Products,'' under certain circumstances, on providing whatever information is
 
required to enable a recipient to replace the object code with a functioning
 
Products,'' under certain circumstances, depends on providing whatever information
 
is required to enable a recipient to replace the object code with a functioning
 
modified version.
 

	
 
This was a compromise that was difficult for the FSF to agree to during the
...
 
@@ -4280,13 +4280,13 @@ market for Free Software-oriented business models also exists. There is the
 
traditional model of selling copies of Free Software distributions.
 
Many companies make substantial revenue
 
from this model. Some choose this model because they have
 
found that for higher-end hardware, the cost of the profit made from
 
proprietary software licensing fees is negligible. The real profit is
 
in the hardware, but it is essential that software be stable, reliable
 
and dependable, and the users be allowed to have unfettered access to
 
it. Free Software, and GPL'd software in particular (because IBM can
 
be assured that proprietary versions of the same software will not
 
exist to compete on their hardware) is the right choice.
 
found that for higher-end hardware, the profit made from proprietary
 
software licensing fees is negligible. The real profit is in the hardware,
 
but it is essential that software be stable, reliable and dependable, and
 
the users be allowed to have unfettered access to it. Free Software, and
 
GPL'd software in particular (because IBM can be assured that proprietary
 
versions of the same software will not exist to compete on their hardware)
 
is the right choice.
 

	
 
For example, charging a ``convenience fee'' for Free Software,
 
when set at a reasonable price (around \$60 or so), can produce some
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)