Changeset - dd20a395b799
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Mike Linksvayer (mlinksva) - 9 years ago 2014-11-16 15:32:41
ml@gondwanaland.com
not all cc sharealike licenses are copyleft, so be specific
automatic relicensing is an exaggeration
cc by-sa case is even more nuanced, briefly mention in fn
1 file changed with 12 insertions and 10 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -1006,16 +1006,18 @@ combined and modified works.  As such, software licensed under the terms of
 
``GPLv2-only'' cannot be combined with works licensed ``GPLv3-or-later''.
 
This is admittedly a frustrating outcome.
 

	
 
Other copyleft licenses that appeared after GPL, such
 
as the Creative Commons ``Share Alike'' licenses, the Eclipse Public License
 
and the Mozilla Public License \textbf{require} all copyright holders choosing
 
to use any version of those licenses to automatically accept and relicense
 
their copyrighted works under new versions.  Of course, Creative Commons, the
 
Eclipse Foundation, and the Mozilla Foundation (like the FSF) have generally
 
served as excellent stewards of their licenses.  Copyright holders using
 
those licenses seems to find it acceptable to fully delegate all future
 
licensing decisions for their copyrights to these organizations without a
 
second thought.
 
Other copyleft licenses that appeared after GPL, such as the Creative Commons
 
``Attribution-Share Alike'' licenses, the Eclipse Public License and the
 
Mozilla Public License \textbf{require} all copyright holders choosing
 
to use any version of those licenses to automatically allow use of their
 
copyrighted works under new versions.\footnote{CC-BY-SA-2.0 and greater only
 
permit licensing of adaptations under future versions; 1.0 did not have
 
any accomodation for future version compatibility.}  Of course, Creative
 
Commons, the Eclipse Foundation, and the Mozilla Foundation (like the FSF)
 
have generally served as excellent stewards of their licenses.  Copyright
 
holders using those licenses seems to find it acceptable to fully delegate
 
all future licensing decisions for their copyrights to these organizations
 
without a second thought.
 

	
 
However, note that FSF gives herein the control of copyright holders to
 
decide whether or not to implicitly trust the FSF in its work of drafting
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)