Changeset - a7ffbb9ee575
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-21 01:00:02
bkuhn@ebb.org
Removed some specific company names from here, particularly because the
information is somewhat out of date.
1 file changed with 5 insertions and 6 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -4238,8 +4238,8 @@ equivalents.
 
Using Free Software in house is certainly helpful, but a thriving
 
market for Free Software-oriented business models also exists. There is the
 
traditional model of selling copies of Free Software distributions.
 
Many companies, including IBM and Red Hat, make substantial revenue
 
from this model. IBM primarily chooses this model because they have
 
Many companies make substantial revenue
 
from this model. Some choose this model because they have
 
found that for higher-end hardware, the cost of the profit made from
 
proprietary software licensing fees is negligible. The real profit is
 
in the hardware, but it is essential that software be stable, reliable
...
 
@@ -4248,7 +4248,7 @@ it. Free Software, and GPL'd software in particular (because IBM can
 
be assured that proprietary versions of the same software will not
 
exists to compete on their hardware) is the right choice.
 

	
 
Red Hat has actually found that a ``convenience fee'' for Free Software,
 
For example, charging a ``convenience fee'' for Free Software,
 
when set at a reasonable price (around \$60 or so), can produce some
 
profit. Even though Red Hat's system is fully downloadable on their
 
Web site, people still go to local computer stores and buy copies of their
...
 
@@ -4268,8 +4268,7 @@ for GCC --- mostly consisting of new ports of GCC to different or new,
 
embedded targets. Eventually, Cygnus was so successful that
 
it was purchased by Red Hat where it remains a profitable division.
 

	
 
However, there are very small companies like CodeSourcery, as well as
 
other medium-sized companies like MontaVista and OpenTV that compete in
 
However, there are very small companies that compete in
 
this space. Because the code-base is protect by GPL, it creates and
 
demands industry trust. Companies can cooperate on the software and
 
improve it for everyone. Meanwhile, companies who rely on GCC for their
...
 
@@ -4288,7 +4287,7 @@ discussed earlier in this tutorial, a copyright holder is permitted under
 
copyright law to license a software system under her copyright as many
 
different ways as she likes to as many different parties as she wishes.
 

	
 
Some companies, such as Oracle, use this to their
 
Some companies use this to their
 
financial advantage with regard to a GPL'd code base. The standard
 
version is available from the company under the terms of the GPL\@.
 
However, parties can purchase separate proprietary software licensing for
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)