Changeset - 831c21febb29
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
enyst - 10 years ago 2014-09-19 22:09:46
engel.nyst@gmail.com
Strictly speaking, for proprietary relicensing 'only' unconditional permissions are needed.

Signed-off-by: enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>
1 file changed with 5 insertions and 4 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -4322,10 +4322,11 @@ versions, and those forks that exist remain freely available.
 

	
 
A final common business model that is perhaps the most controversial is
 
proprietary relicensing of a GPL'd code base. This is only an option for
 
software in which a particular entity is the sole copyright holder. As
 
discussed earlier in this tutorial, a copyright holder is permitted under
 
copyright law to license a software system under her copyright as many
 
different ways as she likes to as many different parties as she wishes.
 
software in which a particular entity is the sole copyright holder or has
 
unconditional relicensing permissions. As discussed earlier in this tutorial,
 
a copyright holder is permitted under copyright law to license a software
 
system under her copyright as many different ways as she likes to as many
 
different parties as she wishes.
 

	
 
Some companies use this to their
 
financial advantage with regard to a GPL'd code base. The standard
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)