Changeset - 67115cb25737
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-15 16:28:37
bkuhn@ebb.org
Explain terminology better.
1 file changed with 18 insertions and 2 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -172,8 +172,24 @@ Software'' to refer to noncommercial software that restricts freedom
 
commercial software that restricts freedom (such as nearly all of
 
Microsoft's and Oracle's offerings).
 

	
 
The remainder of this section considers each of the four freedoms in
 
detail.
 
Keep in mind that the none of the terms ``software freedom'', ``open source''
 
and ``free software'' are not known to be trademarked by any organization in
 
any jurisdiction.  As such, it's quite common that these terms are abused and
 
misused by parties who wish to bank on the popularity of software freedom.
 
When one considers using, modifying or redistributing a software package that
 
purports to be Open Source or Free Software, one \textbf{must} verify that
 
the license grants software freedom
 

	
 
Furthermore, throughout this text, we generally prefer the term ``software
 
freedom'', as this is the least ambiguous term available to describe software
 
that meets the Free Software Definition.  For example, it is well known and
 
often discussed that the adjective ``free'' has two unrelated meanings in
 
English: ``free as in freedom'' and ``free as in price''.  Meanwhile, the
 
term ``open source'' is even more confusing, because it refers only to the
 
``freedom to study'', which is merely a subset of one of the four freedoms.
 

	
 
The remainder of this section considers each of each component of software
 
freedom in detail.
 

	
 
\subsection{The Freedom to Run}
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)