\label{thinkpenguin-included-ccs}

Therefore, the investigator first purchased the TPE-NWIFIROUTER through an

online order, and when the package arrived, examined the contents of the box.

The investigator immediately discovered that ThinkPenguin had taken advice

from \S~\ref{offer-for-source} in this guide, and have chosen to use

\hyperref[GPLv2s3a]{GPLv2\S3(a)} and \hyperref[GPLv3s6]{GPLv3s6}, rather an

using the \hperref[offer-for-source]{problematic offer for source

  provisions}.  This choice not only speeds up the investigation (since there

is no CCS offer to test), but also simplifies the compliance requirements for

ThinkPenguin.

\section{Lessons Learned}

\begin{enumerate}

\item Even though copyleft licenses have them,

  \hyperref[thinkpenguin-included-ccs]{\bf avoid the offer-for-source

    provisions.}  Not only does including the CCS alongside binary

  distribution make violation investigation and compliance confirmation

  substantially easier, but more importantly it also

  \hyperref[offer-for-source]{completes the distributor's CCS compliance

    obligations at the time of distribution} (provided, of course, that the

  distributor is otherwise in compliance with copyleft.

\end{enumerate}

\label{GPLv2s3a}