guide-enyst feedhttps://k.copyleft.org/guide-enystChanges on guide-enyst repositoryen-usFri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -00005The fragment is indeed large enough to be fair to state its license. I'd suggest however to not say that quotations are licensable. Not every quotation is 'l...https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/93e6e62e6a5a09dda5cb9adc9efdbe708610b335enyst committed on 2015-04-03 03:06:38<br/>branch: various-contributions<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/93e6e62e6a5a09dda5cb9adc9efdbe708610b335">93e6e62e</a><pre>The fragment is indeed large enough to be fair to state its license. I&apos;d suggest however to not say that quotations are licensable. Not every quotation is &apos;licensed&apos; or needs to be. In theory, anyway. While in this case it&apos;s okay, I&apos;d suggest to call it, for example, &apos;fragment&apos;. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (1 lines added, 1 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -0000From public domain to copyleft, insert a couple phrases about permissive licensing, as alternative for public domain and as intention to enforce certain cond...https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/224e1913909cd7acdd52a4fb2817edc71f9c360eenyst committed on 2015-04-03 03:06:38<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/224e1913909cd7acdd52a4fb2817edc71f9c360e">224e1913</a><pre>From public domain to copyleft, insert a couple phrases about permissive licensing, as alternative for public domain and as intention to enforce certain conditions. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (25 lines added, 2 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -0000Removed extra word. Fully copyrightable = copyrightable, right? Signed-off-by: enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com> https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/c4f446cc833b180701a1ae23186a1354c44a235aenyst committed on 2015-04-03 03:06:38<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/c4f446cc833b180701a1ae23186a1354c44a235a">c4f446cc</a><pre>Removed extra word. Fully copyrightable = copyrightable, right? Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (1 lines added, 1 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -0000Nitpicking, there aren't only two types, those by the license and those breaking the license, but also those covered by limitations/exemptions in copyright l...https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/5b18f9e927e393b60660b4445f89e8aaf7bb465denyst committed on 2015-04-03 03:06:38<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/5b18f9e927e393b60660b4445f89e8aaf7bb465d">5b18f9e9</a><pre>Nitpicking, there aren&apos;t only two types, those by the license and those breaking the license, but also those covered by limitations/exemptions in copyright law. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (5 lines added, 4 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -0000'Licensed not sold' is a disputable and disputed fallacy, cf. for example B. Carver, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1586580 and many othe...https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/dde19a6fb5ff249f26817f8a4230339300a9763cenyst committed on 2015-04-03 03:06:38<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/dde19a6fb5ff249f26817f8a4230339300a9763c">dde19a6f</a><pre>&apos;Licensed not sold&apos; is a disputable and disputed fallacy, cf. for example B. Carver, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1586580">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1586580</a> and many others. I&apos;d suggest to avoid it. There is no need for it: Free Software offers all rights to enjoy the software in the privacy of one&apos;s home without doing anything special (arguably even when enjoying rights under copyright, but privately), it&apos;s distribution that triggers obligations. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (11 lines added, 11 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -0000Add footnote on automatic licensing provision. There is a widespread assumption in free licensing work that permissions come from the copyright holders -alw...https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/bdddb68089ed2efa981d12f21a72f16dadf685a7enyst committed on 2015-04-03 03:06:38<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/bdddb68089ed2efa981d12f21a72f16dadf685a7">bdddb680</a><pre>Add footnote on automatic licensing provision. There is a widespread assumption in free licensing work that permissions come from the copyright holders -always-. This assumption is not unwarranted; among other reasons, because there is a &apos;fundamental distinction in copyright law&apos; (Nimmer) between material object and intellectual content. Even if the distribution chain would give rights (which is not the perception in free licensing), and even if someone on this chain would lose their rights (terminated), downstream (also) has the license from the (c) holder to get their rights from as long as they fulfill the conditions themselves. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (13 lines added, 1 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -0000Modified works are derivative works, they are under the scope of 106 (2) (while they are under 106 (1) as well). I assume the intention here was to clarify t...https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/dfb563868de65939acdffaed4a842d68d2ae1d07enyst committed on 2015-04-03 03:06:38<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/dfb563868de65939acdffaed4a842d68d2ae1d07">dfb56386</a><pre>Modified works are derivative works, they are under the scope of 106 (2) (while they are under 106 (1) as well). I assume the intention here was to clarify they&apos;re the easy case of derivative works? That seems important and correct. Proposed a few tweaks to express this idea without implying that modified works are not derivative works. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (13 lines added, 13 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 03:06:38 -0000Tweak text. Signed-off-by: enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com> https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/7ecf910fa1bae807893c7794aa1118f9676ab71denyst committed on 2015-04-03 01:42:45<br/>branch: typo-fixes<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/7ecf910fa1bae807893c7794aa1118f9676ab71d">7ecf910f</a><pre>Tweak text. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (1 lines added, 1 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 01:42:45 -0000Missing word. Signed-off-by: enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com> https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/002a6b9ded48f6ae65bf200af7710be267ca7450enyst committed on 2015-04-03 01:42:45<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/002a6b9ded48f6ae65bf200af7710be267ca7450">002a6b9d</a><pre>Missing word. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (1 lines added, 1 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 01:42:45 -0000Missing word. Signed-off-by: enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com> https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/c820a8dfe47d68cfe5c09f2745d8c4bc12f9e1c0enyst committed on 2015-04-03 01:42:44<br/>changeset: <a href="https://k.copyleft.org/guide-enyst/changeset/c820a8dfe47d68cfe5c09f2745d8c4bc12f9e1c0">c820a8df</a><pre>Missing word. Signed-off-by: enyst &lt;engel.nyst@gmail.com&gt; M gpl-lgpl.tex (1 lines added, 1 lines removed)</pre>enyst <engel.nyst@gmail.com>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 01:42:44 -0000